Friday, November 29, 2013

Arg. Paragraph rewrite



1. As we all know, water is a scarce resource in Texas, and such resources are decreasing every year, and the water should belong to all citizens who live here. But according to the Texas law, the landowners can draw as much water from their own land as they want, so I think the law should be improved. In my opinion, the law should provide a limit on the amount that the farmers are allowed to pump, if the aquifer is endangered under their farms. This is because first of all, I think the water in the underground belongs to all of us who live in Texas, and the water those landowners draw out, may come from somewhere else or just flow through. Secondly, overpumping the underground water  may cause a dry-up situation, and many areas where use of the water from underground will be influenced. Finally, not only in order to protect water resources in Texas, but also for our children who have water to drink in the future, we should improve the law, and this is just what I think. (QK)

2.  Based on a report by the Lubbock Water Department, the city water currently comes from three sources, two groundwater well fields in Robert County and a well field in Bailey County. The third source is Lake Allen Henry. [1] As a matter of fact, in 2011, the third source was Lake Meredith, but in 2012 Lake Meredith dried and put the city on stage 2 restriction of usage limiting mainly lawn water and carwash. [2] The city, after completion of Lake Allen Henry project, went back to stage 1 restriction as of August 20th 2012. [1] (N.K.)

References:
Lubbock water department, http://www.mylubbock.us/departmental-websites/departments/water-department/home
Abby Reed (2012), Lubbock water crisis, how did we get to here?, KCDB website, http://www.kcbd.com/story/16903788/lubbocks-water-crisis-how-did-we-get-here

3.  I believe that water is one of the biggest problems facing society today, not only in Lubbock but in general, but focusing only in this region, we have two major industries mostly occupied in the water supply, which are the oil industry and agriculture. How does this affect us? It is simple; farmers take more water than they need, without any rules that limit, because in Texas you can take all the water you find in your land; on the other hand, we have the oil industry that generates millions of dollars and with that justifies the damage it generates to groundwater aquifers. So I think that you should implement some governing rules on water overuse, for example, using treated water, the same industry or farmers reusing their water. (JAPC)

4. The water crisis may have several issues which need attention. The water crisis includes water shortage, water pollution etc. When there is not enough drinking water, water crisis is felt. Coping with water scarcity requires serious solutions. I believe one of the most important factors leading to a water problem in West Texas is drought. I rest on the belief that at the beginning, we have to recognize what the water problems are, and how we can prevent such problems. I think first we should do some research regarding this issue, and then we should find some ways to resolve the problems. I believe if  the government increases the amount of funds regarding water problem research, it will help scientists to explore what the exact problem is, and help experts to bring up proper solutions about water problems. I think there are some methods we should do to prevent water crisis, such as ways to cope with drought and shortage crisis, identifying water resources available, public awareness and public participation in water planning and management, careful attention to the management of water, adjusting the water pressure in the distribution network, and controlling uses of high consumption. The other way is to make some policies to reduce water problems. For example, with population growth, natural resources of water are running out. Thus, sometimes due to water shortages, the governments could enact some rules to restrict the amount of water usage, so that it can adjust its consumption. According to Sauter and Hess the low rain fall engenders severe drought in west Texas in the United States, and if it continues west Texas cities face lots of problems such as crop losses, low reservoir levels, and water shortage emergencies. In this case, I think the government could provide some advertisement to inform people about the severity of the water problem and encourage them to reduce the amount of water which they use. Overall, I think the government and people both together can give hands to each other and try to find the way to solve the water problems.  (SH)

Reference:
Sauter, M.B.,and Hess, A.E.M. (2013, August 1). Nine cities running out of Water. 24/7 Wall Street. From http:/247wallst.com/Special-report/2013/08/01/nine-cities-running-out-of-water

5. It is Texas tradition (and law) that you can draw as much water from your own well as you want, even at the expense of the aquifer that everyone shares. I do not agree with this tradition totally, but I do partially. I feel farmers and landowners should be limited for some level and these levels should vary depending on the type of farming. Reasons for my statement can be organized as follows.  For a strong society and for the balanced environment, both humans and animals must survive. Water and foods are the most essential things for animals to survive. In that case we need water not only for drinking and day to day life, but also for farming. This situation is true for Lubbock too. Therefore farmers should be able to use water as much as they want for farming. On the other hand, when we read several articles about water in Lubbock, such as Dillon (2013), Reed (2012), and Fleming (2012), we have to consider all actions that are necessary to save water. And ground water belongs to everybody, not only to the landowner where the well is located. On that point of view, farmers, such as cotton farmers, should be generous and they should limit their water usage to save water for the future. Concerning these facts, my idea is that there should be a reasonable limit per period for farmers for their water usage and these limits should be different depending on the type of farming.  (CD)

Reference
Dillon, K. (2013, September, 1). The Ogallala Aquifer, an important water resource, is in trouble.   Retrieved on September, 5, 2013 from http://www.kansascity.com/2013/09/01/4452173/the-ogallala-aquifer-an-important.html

6. I believe that government must control the water resource by its own. Water is like every kind of resource. If we don’t protect it, it will lose it sooner than we imagine. Taking petroleum for example, this is common knowledge that we are going to run out of oil in the following decades or even sooner. Hence, water is in the same condition. Nothing is infinite. Moreover, we have too much population now, and the resources on earth are getting scarce. Therefore, we should prevent the disaster earlier. Then, not only do we have to limit the usage, but also we are supposed to use it in a sustainable way. To sum up, I disagree with the policy in Texas. It is ridiculous because if people can use the water as much as they want, no one will stop to think their behavior is proper or not. In my opinion, those resources should be normed and be considered profoundly. (SYH)


7. According to Texas tradition and law, Texas groundwater is possessed by landowners. Landowners have the right to pump water from their well. Moreover, all regulations for utilizing the groundwater are very beneficial to the landowner. Nowadays the aquifer has become dry in Texas. It is an issue that farmers and landowners should have limitations for using the groundwater. I also agree that some regulations need to be adjusted; however, in my opinion, if there are limitations to use water for cultivation, the amount of cultivation could be reduced and then farmers could be damaged for their income. In addition, there is already the regulation to prevent over using the groundwater. Instead of limitations, if changing the law or adjusting the rule, the aquifer in Texas could be conserved without any damage to farmers and landowners. (MK)

Reference
Ronald A. Kaiser (2005, July). Who Owns the Water?. Texas Parks and Wildlife magazines. Retrived on Sep. 19, 2013 from http://texaswater.tamu.edu/water-law

8. Texas water can be divided into groundwater and surface water (Kaiser). Texas surface water belongs to the state of Texas. On the other hand, Texas groundwater belongs to the landowner; the landowner can draw whatever water is available, regardless of the consequences of pumping on neighboring wells (Texas water law). This law seems not rational today especially when Texas is facing a water crisis. Fresh water is limited sources of our planet and human beings share the water on earth. If some people run out of their local water then they will have to go to some other places for water; if there are too many people run out of their water sources and go to other places for water, this will eventually lead to a war fighting for water. Therefore, we have to use the water wisely before the water crisis is still under control. Thus the Texas groundwater right is not appropriate for wisely water using. It is not reasonable that the landowner can draw as much water as they can under their ground. All of the  ground water reservoirs are connected with each other. If the landowner draws all of the water underneath the land, water from neighboring lands, even from other states, will flow to the land and fill it. Thus the landowner might technically steal ground water from other states, which is against other states' laws. It would be more rational if there is a limit for the landowners based on the sizes of their lands. In summary, water source belongs to human beings and we should all share and use it wisely. (C.L.)


9. Clear water nowadays has been regarded as one of natural resources that could be depleted by human usage. Many organizations in the world call for a preservation of clear water resources for a sustainable world. According to Fleming (2012), a climate change and other different factors such as a cycle of hotter temperatures, more people, water-sapping cotton farming, and a devastating 2011 drought lead to a situation of scarce water. Therefore, although Texas tradition (and law) allows people to draw as much water from their own well as they want, it should have a policy on how much water business organizations use, especially farmers and landowners; or the government should impose a policy on farmers or landowners who benefit from using more water than other people. The reason for this idea is to protect a sustainable development in Texas where water is always a crucial issue for human life. In addition, the aquifer is not a finite water resource that can never be used up. In that sense, people should set up requirements for business usage and advise users to have an appropriate behavior to preserve clear water. (D.P.)

References
Fleming, P. (2012). Portrait of a Drought: Finding Water Where It Ain’t. Climate Progress.

10. Texas groundwater belongs to the landowner. Groundwater is governed by the rule of capture, which means landowners the right to capture unlimited amount of groundwater by tapping into the underlying aquifer beneath their property. On the other hand, surface water belongs to the state of Texas. It can be used by a landowner only with the state's permission. Because of this rule, farmers and landowners use ground water until wells are drying out. This practice appears to have been problems for neighboring landowners, when they are withdrawing limited amounts of water or they cannot pump enough to significant amount. (SG)




11.Long years of overuse followed by three years of drought has depleted water sources in west Texas and left hundreds of communities struggling with water crisis. Millions of people are living under some form of water rationing across the south-west (Goldenberg, 2013). Three entities are responsible for the overuse of water sources: ranchers, cotton farmers and fast growing cities (Fleming, 2012). I think there should be water restriction for all of them. Cities have already been experiencing various forms of restrictions. But Texas laws treat the ground waters as the property of landowners. This prevents applying water restrictions on farmers. However, the situation is so dire that a change in these laws seems to be necessary. Now, water system has reached a point that no normal amount of precipitation can recharge it (Goldenberg, 2013). Draught and climate change has made the revival of the water system even more difficult. If this situation continues, sooner or later, the water system will be past the point of regeneration where no amount of precipitation can revive the system. To prevent this real catastrophe all those who use water, including farmers, should be subjected to restrictions. (HS) 

References
Fleming, P. (2012). Portrait of a Drought: Finding Water Where It Ain’t. Climate Progress. Retrieved from http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/10/19/1052091/portrait-of-a-drought-finding-water-where-it-aint/
Goldenberg, S. (2013, Aug. 11). A Texan tragedy: ample oil, no water. The Guardian. Retrieved on Aug. 28, 2013 from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/aug/11/texas-tragedy-ample-oil-no-water


Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Proposal (QK)



Proposal
It is a common idea that in the West part of the U.S., especially in Texas and Colorado, the water resources have declined in recent years. According to a group that monitors drought conditions, Texas has averaged the worst level of drought since the beginning of 2011 (Sauter and Hess, 2013). So as we can see, we are facing a water shortage problem in Lubbock. Based on a report by the Lubbock Water Department, Lubbock’s water currently comes from three sources, well fields in Roberts County; another well field in Bailey County and the third one is Lake Allen HenryAnd according to the report, there was another water source named Lake Meredith in 2011, but it dried up in 2012. This situation is severe, and as we can imagine, if the drought still exists here, severe water shortages will become a reality. And we are going to find out that Lubbock residents’ views on water resources
Some people say now towns in West Texas like Lubbock are facing a grim reality; water is so scarce that almost 15 million people need water rationing (Goldenberg, 2013). As in Lubbock, Lake Meredith, which have mentioned above, used to be a main water resource of Lubbock, and dried up in 2012. Therefore, the Mayor of Lubbock came out and announced to the public about limiting and saving water (Reed, 2012). And this situation makes more and more citizens recognize the importance of water resourcesMany factors contributed to the present conditionsuch as fewer water sources, increasing population, inconsiderate usewater sapping cotton farming, historically low rainfall, climate change, oil industry overuse of water and fracking (Fleming, 2012).
As we all know drought and water shortage will cause many problems, especially in agricultureLong periods of drought will cause a large number of crop failures, and even wildfires. Seconddrought will affect some industries which need more water, and make many operational problems for them, and they may even need to relocate their factory (West, n. d). And overuse of water is a major cause of  the drought
So as we can see, Lubbock has a water crisis, and we are very interested in how many people know this situation and what they will say if we tell them. Some people might say, I do not care about this”, however, some other people may say “I will pay attention to this stuff”. We are also interested in how people feel about limited water, and what about different viewbetween residents and students, or men and women? I think men will be more focused on long-term interests, to protect groundwater and other water resources, while women pay more attention to the current situation; they are more concerned about the water situation of water resources, and they are more worried about whether water is not enough for them. As for students, I think they are more concerned about the water quality and whether the law of water is suitable or not, and our residents may pay more attention to whether we have enough water sources for them. 
If droughts continue, the situation will become worse and worse. I think if people know about this situation, most people will do water-saving activities. So I believe we will find that most Lubbock residents are aware of the problem and they are trying to conserve water now. And we may find that many of the Lubbock residents have their own ideas on the water situation, and use their own methods to protect the water resources. What I want to say is that  protecting our water resources is not only in order to protect water resources, but also so that our children have water to drink in the future, and have a happier and more comfortable life in Lubbock.
Reference 
Fleming, P. (2012, October 19). Portrait of a Drought: Finding Water Where It Ain’t. Climate Progress. Retrieved on September 29, 2013  from http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/10/19/1052091/portrait-of-a-drought-finding-water-where-it-aint 

Goldenberg, S. (2013, August 11). A Texan tragedy: ample oil, no water. Fracking boom sucks away precious water from beneath the ground, leaving cattle dead, farms bone-dry and people thirsty. The Guardian Retrieved on September 29, 2013  frohttp://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/aug/11/texas-tragedy-ample-oil-no-water

National Environmental Education And Training Foundation, (1994December 1), Environmental  Attitudes And Behaviors of American Youth (Chapter Two: Knowledge). Retrieved on October 28, 2013 from http://eelink.net/ROPER/TOC.html

Reed, A. (2012, February 9). Lubbock's water crisis, how did we get here? KCBD. Retrieved on September 30, 2013 from http://www.kcbd.com/story/16903788/lubbocks-water-crisis-how-did-we-get-here

Sauter, M. B. and Hess, A.E.M. (2013August 1), Nine cities running out of water. Retrieved on September 30, 2013 from http://finance.yahoo.com/news/nine-cities-running-water-192757786.html 

West, Larry. (n,d.). Former About.com Guide What are the Effects of Drought? Retrieved on September 30, 2013 from http://environment.about.com/od/environmental-events/a/droughteffects.html

Friday, November 22, 2013

Chart # 38-45

chart #38

chart #39

chart #40

chart #41

chart #42

chart #43

chart #44

chart #45

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Proposal

                                         Research Proposal on Lubbock's water----Can Liu
The water crisis is a common problem that has happened everywhere because of the growth of population, farming, contamination and so on. No exception, The City of  Lubbock is also facing a severe water crisis. Lake Meredith has been the primary water source for years for Lubbock (Reed, 2012) until 2011. As Lake Meredith has completely dried up, the water crisis has been paid more attention than ever before. In 2013, the main source of water for Lubbock comes from two well fields in Roberts County and Bailey County and Lake Alan Henry. The Lubbock Water Department has acclaimed that the City is constantly exploring water sources for Lubbock and they have made plans for the residents for the next 100 years (Lubbock Water Department, 2013). However, using water wisely is always the best way to protect our water sources.
There are a lot of articles  discussing the solution for Lubbock's water crisis. "Lubbock residents use 190 gallons per person each day. If we can cut it off to 170 gallons per person, not only can we save money but also we can extend the usage of our water sources for several more years" (KCBD News, 2005). Deputy City Manager Tom Adams says, "If we didn't do anything, it's possible by 2015, we would need a new source. But if we can conserve just a little bit, we can push that to 2020, 2025, even 2030" (KCBD News, 2005, par. 2). Because of the lack of actions to save water, this prediction already came true in 2013 when we started the new supply of Lake Alan Henry. Thus Adams, from The Water Advisory Commission, proposed a rate structure in the way we are charged for water. Adams says, "The more you use it stays the same rate. The next step would be an increasing rate structure where the more you use the higher the price is" (KCBD News, 2005, par. 3). This efficient way to address the water crisis was adopted by many cities such as Tucson, Portland and Denver.  Unfortunately, it is confirmed by the City of Lubbock that the city had not applied a water rate structure since 2006 (KCBD News, 2013). "The City of Lubbock is on a block rate system and it has been encouraging water conservation for many decades and will still stay on the water conservation plan" (KCBD News, 2013).
 New technology of recycling water may also plays a crucial role for solving the water crisis in the future. Rainwater from NASA mentioned that the Johnson Space Center [JSC] has spent years trying to find a new way to recycle water for long term space flight (KCBD News, 2005). Rainwater says, "They're trying to look for other means that don't have to use up the filters as much. So what our work here has been focusing on is biological means to treat the water where you essentially use microorganisms to degrade the organic components of our urine" (2005, par. 12). This new technology could be used in the City of Lubbock to tackle the water crisis. Lubbock's wastewater treatment plant manager Mary Gonzales says, "We treat about 21 million gallons per day" (KCBD News, 2005, par. 13). Therefore we could add oxygen to accelerate the bacteria to eat those organic materials in waste water and create a new renewable source of water for the City of Lubbock (KCBD news, 2005). If we can use the massive wind energy in Texas in waste water treatment plants, we will be able to reduce significantly the high cost of recycling water and make this plan come true in the near future.
When everybody is trying to figure out the best way of dealing with Lubbock's water crisis, a proposal that leases lands to a fracking company from Fort Worth was passed during a city council meeting in March, 2012 (Gonzalez, 2012). However, this big thing for the City was not presented to any town hall meetings for the public to discuss it. Ellysa Gonzalez said, "They presented no opportunities for public discussion on the matter. It was like it was a back room deal" (Gonzalez, 2012, par. 11). After talking to a few people, Gonzalez found out that not one of them knew that the city had already signed a contract about the fracking operation. “A lot of people we have talked with do not know that the city of Lubbock leased out these lands to a company that plans to do fracking on it,” she said (Gonzalez, 2012, par. 7). “It’s hydraulic fracturing of the underground bedrock to extract oil and natural gas.” Moreover, an online petition has been posted by Sandra Manzari, a Lubbock resident, to propose a vote by the residents about the fracking (Gonzalez, 2012).  “I teach my son that we are a democracy,” Manzari stated in an email. “A government for the people by the people, yet this city council voted to have fracking in the city and I never got a say” (Gonzalez, 2012, par. 13). Thus, we did a survey during this study to find out how much people know about the water crisis and the fracking problems in Lubbock. Manzari claims the public to be uninformed. “Something as important as this should be a vote by the people not a little city council meeting,” she said in an email. “We are not deciding on if we need more parking meters or not” (Gonzalez, 2012, par.15). Water contamination, excessive use of water and air contamination by fracking are highly related to every resident in Lubbock (Magelssen, 2012). Thus, every resident has rights to be informed and vote to make their own decisions. 
In order to evaluate Lubbock residents' opinions about the water crisis and fracking, we did a survey on campus asking how much they knew about fracking and if they worried about Lubbock's water sources.   Based on the literature review, it seems that most people didn't know much about fracking and the huge environmental impacts on water sources by fracking. Furthermore, it is also likely that engineering education level will affect the ideas of people on fracking and its impacts. Since there were much fewer females in engineering fields, it was safe to conclude that males would tend to have more knowledge about fracking and the water crisis than females did.  Consequently,  males would worry more about the impacts of fracking to water sources and they would tend to be more active to save water and avoid any waste of water.  As a consequence, we believed that knowing more about fracking would make people worried more about the water supply in Lubbock and thus more people would tend to blame the oil drillers. [C.L.]

Gonzalez, E. (2012, Aug. 6). Should we vote on fracking. Retrieved on Oct 3, 2013 from                                                                       http://lubbockonline.com/local-news/2012-08-06/should-we-vote-fracking#.UnHPPY0jK4Q

KCBD News. (2005, Nov. 5). Lubbock's Water Crisis: Keys to the Future. Retrieved on Sep 26, 2013 from

KCBD News. (2013, Aug. 16). City of Lubbock disputes water shortage claims. Retrieved on Sep 26, 2013                        from  http://www.kcbd.com/story/23156106/city-of-lubbock-disputes-water-shortage-claims
Lubbock Water Department. Retrieved on Sep 26, 2013 from  

Magelssen, T. (2012, Mar. 12). Hydraulic fracturing experts discuss problems associated with process.                         Retrieved on Oct 3, 2013 http://lubbockonline.com/local-news/2012-03-12/hydraulic-fracturing-                   experts-discuss-problems-associated-process#.Uk2OSI0jLXa

Reed, A. (2012, Feb. 9). Lubbock's water crisis, how did we get here. Retrieved on Sep 26, 2013 from

LUBBOCK WATER
PRUPOSAL

Jose Payan

Nowadays, all the people we are witnessing the great changes that are taking the planet earth, such as global warming, the changing seasons, natural phenomena and so on. All this because of the actions we have day by day, we are polluting and consuming our resources unconscious, destroying our planet.

       As far as water is concerned, on planet earth have three quarters of water and of that total only 3% is fresh water, of this 3% only 0.7% fresh water, of this 3% only 0.7% is for human use, (Howard, 2013) and their various activities; two of these activities are agriculture and fracking into the oil field. Two of the most profitable activities in our region and which are running out with our water reservations, since there is not almost any kind of restriction on water use. (Avalanche-Journal, 2013)


       For many years, Lake Meredith was the primary source of water Lubbock. But the drought this past year and the lack of rainfall above the lake has dried completely. Water levels have lowered and increased water consumption. That is why restrictions were imposed on the use of water in the city. Despite this, the acquisition of Lake Henry, will provide supply for at least the next eight or ten years. Moreover, remains the possibility that the water runs out in Lubbock, if we don't take care about save water. (Reed, 2012)
While fracking typically consumes less water than farming or residential uses, the exploration method is increasing competition for the precious resource, driving up the price of water and burdening already depleted aquifers and rivers in certain drought-stricken stretches. Some farmers and city leaders worry that the freaking boom is consuming too much of a scarce resource, while others examine the push for production as an opportunity to earn money by selling water. (Garance, 2013)
Moreover oilfield representatives say their activities are not destroying the water supply, which in fact they are using treated water and improving its processes, this in order to not cause environmental harm. Another big factor in this crisis is agriculture, however, as in the oil field they assure to only use water that rightfully belongs to them as it is on their property. (Sarah, 2012)
We have been talking about the big companies, but how informed are the people of Lubbock. Who is more informed about this issue? Who is more concerned? Besides who really is willing to do something to save water? These are questions we must answer in order to find and propose real and workable solutions.
  





Bibliography

·                      Howard, P. (2013, Nov. 5). "Water, Water, Everywhere...." Retrieved on Nov. 6, 2013 from          http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/earthwherewater.html
Reed, A. (2012, Feb. 9). Lubbock water crisis, how did we get here? Retrieved on Nov. 1, 2013 from http://www.kcbd.com/story/16903788/lubbocks-water-crisis-how-did-we-get-here

Avalanche-Journal (2013, Mar. 10) In Texas, water use for fracking stirs concerns Retrieved on Oct. 13, 2013 from http://lubbockonline.com/agriculture/2013-03-10/texas-water-use-fracking-stirs-concerns#.UoFHlfmINQQ


Garance, B. (2013, Jun. 16) Fracking fuels water fights in nation's dry spots. Retrieved on Oct. 17, 2013 from http://lubbockonline.com/filed-online/2013-06-16/fracking-fuels-water-fights-nations-dry-spots#.UoFbT_mINQQ


Sarah, M.(2012, Aug. 07) Tech Professor says concerns over fracking unfounded. Retrieved on Sep. 24, 2013 from http://www.kcbd.com/story/19215063/lubbock-fracking-to-be-addressed-at-city-council-meeting

Thursday, November 14, 2013



Research Proposal

Hamed Shirmohammadi

The objective of this research is to study the attitudes of people in Lubbock toward the city’s water issues. According to some reports Lubbock is among nine cities that are running out of water. A report by U.S. Drought Monitor shows that, among these nine cities, Lubbock has had the worst level of drought since the beginning of 2011 (Sauter & Hess, 2013). By 2014 either new water sources or aggressive water conservation is needed in order to maintain water supply during the summer and by 2025 the existing water supply sources will not be capable of supplying the water demand even if harsh conservation policies are adopted (City of Lubbock, 2013). Currently Lubbock has three water supply sources: Lake Alan Henry , Roberts County well field and Bailey County well field. The well fields are used to pump water up from the Ogallala Aquifer. Lake Alan Henry will run dry in ten years (Reed, 2012) and some studies show that the part of Ogallala which is located in Texas could be depleted in 50 years (Chow, 2013). Lubbock’s municipal authorities, denying these estimations, claim that the city has plans to supply water for the next 100 years. 
Lubbock is located in a historically dry area and the prolonged drought has worsened an already dire situation.  Decades of overuse by ranchers, cotton farmers, and fast-growing thirsty cities has depleted water sources. The oil industry's outsize demands on water for fracking has increased the depletion rates. And climate change is making things even worse. The record breaking heat waves in recent years have been further drying out the soil and speeding the evaporation of water in lakes and reservoirs (Goldenberg, 2013).
While there are multiple factors contributing to the current water crisis, it seems that at least in little cities near oil fields people tend to blame the situation on the oil industry ignoring the complexity of the situation (Goldenberg, 2013). Since there is no study on Lubbock residents’ perception toward the water crisis we do not know how people in Lubbock feel about the situation. The goal of this research is to fill this gap by conducting a study on Lubbock residents’ views on the water crisis. Three main questions are to be answered: First, do people think there is a water crisis? Second, if they think there is or will be a water shortage, what do they think has caused the shortage? Third, what measures do they think should be taken to preserve the diminishing water sources?
The study will compare the attitudes of men and women, Texan, non-Texan Americans and international students, and students and non-students toward the water crisis. Our hypotheses about the results of these comparisons are based on the following studies on people’s perceptions on environmental issues: First, studies that have examined the differences in attitudes of men and women toward environmental issues suggest that women are significantly more concerned about local environmental issues than men. Women have also been found to be more concerned about non-local environmental issues. However the magnitude of difference is not significant (Mohai, 1992). Second, education and Environmental concerns are tightly related. A study on “environmental attitudes and behaviors of American youth” shows that students who know “a lot” about the environment are considerably more likely to be worried about environment than students who have a very limited knowledge about environment, by a 67% to 31% margin (National Environmental Education And Training Foundation, 1994). Third, according to a study of people’s perception on water conservation, drought is a significant factor that increases people’s receptivity to water conservation (Sochacka, et al, 2013).
In the light of the information provided by above studies the following hypotheses are developed to be examined: First, women are significantly more likely to be concerned with local environmental issues than men. Local environmental issues are those issues that can pose a potential direct threat to Lubbock community, such as drought, fresh water supply and the effects of fracking. Second, global environmental problems, such as rising sea levels and global warming, concern women and men almost equally. Third, those who are aware of the existence of the severe drought in west Texas and are knowledgeable about Lubbock water are more likely to support water restrictions. Forth, Texans, unlike non-Texans, tend to oppose drastic conservation policies even if they are necessary. Fifth, the tie between education and environmental concerns suggests that students should have higher environmental awareness than non-students. Sixth, although students have higher environmental awareness, they are less emotionally concerned with the long term consequences of water crisis in Lubbock than residents are.  

Bibliography


City of Lubbock. (2013). Strategic Water Supply Plan for the City of Lubbock. My Lubbock. Retrieved September 18, 2013, from: http://www.mylubbock.us/docs/default-source/water-department-file-library/2013-strategic-water-supply-plan.pdf?sfvrsn=2 

Chow, D. (2013, August 26). Huge aquifer that runs through 8 states quickly being tapped out. LiveScience. Retrieved September 14, 2013, from: http://www.nbcnews.com/science/huge-aquifer-runs-through-8-states-quickly-being-tapped-out-8C11009320

Goldenberg, S. (2013, August 11). A Texan tragedy: ample oil, no water. The Guardian. Retrieved September 10, 2013, from: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/aug/11/texas-tragedy-ample-oil-no-water

Mohai, P. (1992). Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society & Natural Resources, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, pp. 1-19.

National Environmental Education and Training Foundation. (1994). Environmental Attitudes And Behaviors of American Youth. Retrieved November 20, 2013 From: http://eelink.net/ROPER/TOC.html

Reed, A. (2012, February 9). Lubbock water crisis, how did we get here? KCBD Retrieved September 20, 2013, from: http://www.kcbd.com/story/16903788/lubbocks-water-crisis-how-did-we-get-here

Sauter, M. B., & Hess, A. E. (2013, August 1). Nine cities running out of water. 24/7 Wall Street. Retrieved September 20, 2013, from: http:/247wallst.com/Special-report/2013/08/01/nine-cities-running-out-of-water

Sochacka, N.W., et al. (2013). Public perceptions of water availability and receptivity to water conservation in Georgia. Proceedings of the 2013 Georgia Water Resources Conference. Retrieved November 30, 2013, from: http://www.gwri.gatech.edu/sites/default/files/files/docs/2013/1.6.2_Sochacka.pdf